Sylvester

  • 剧情
  • Eugen Klöpfer Edith Posca 弗里达·李察 Karl Harbacher EugenKlöpfer
  • 120分钟
  • Sylvester, by the hugely underrated Lupu Pick is o…Sylvester, by the hugely underrated Lupu Pick is one of the least known films of the silent era, and unjustly so. Pick, the director of the slightly less obscure Scherben (Shattered), is almost as forgotten as this, his masterpiece... a film that without doubt, in it's time, was one of the most important of the German silent era.This great Kammerspiel is the middle entry in a trilogy written by the master screenwriter Carl Mayer (see here for a web resource for Mayer, as well as a writeup on Sylvester), all three of which were intended to fall under the directorial auspices of Pick: the first was Scherben (Shattered), the second was Sylvester (New Years Eve), and the last was Der Letzte Mann (The Last Laugh), which, as the film went into production, shifted directorial hands-- and was ultimately helmed by another of Mayer's ongoing collaborators, the great F. W. Murnau.Much has been made about the supposed innovations of Der Letzte Mann/Last Laugh: that it was the first film to be produced without intertitles, and that it was the film to "unchain the camera" via the integration of subjective camera movements. Some attribute these innovations to Murnau completely, others give credit to Karl Freund for innovating the moving camera. Others suggest that it was within the script for Letzte Mann that instructions for the moving camera can be located, and that this innovation, in this film, rests wth Mayer.As for the intertitle issue, the myth is easy to debunk: in Germany at least, one can, through exploration of chronologically preceding titles written by Mayer, see that this screenwriter had been seeking out this kind narrative-pictorial purity for years already by the time Letzte went into production. Hintertreppe (Backstairs, 1921, directed by Leopold Jessner, assisted by Paul Leni), Scherben (Shattered, 1921), Die Strasse (The Street, 1923, directed by Karl Grune), Sylvester (New Years Eve, 1924, Pick) all ran, in initial, domestic German release, with one-to-no intertitles. That makes Der Letzte Mann the fifth film that Mayer scripted for execution without intertitles.Putting aside the issue of the preceding use of moving camera by Yevgeni Bauer, Raul Walsh, Giovanni Pastrone, D.W. Griffith, etc-- the issue of who in Germany who first conceived and extensively utilized the subjective moving camera is put to rest with a simple viewing of Sylvester.Like all Carl Mayer tales-- and like Scherben before it-- Sylvester is an exceedingly simple story... it is New Years Eve, and all levels of the social strata are celebrating. Like a restless deity exploring the substance of his human creations, in all the colliding facets of their existence, the camera comes in out of the rolling waves of the void of nighttime... announcing with a single opening intertitle the inscription from the Tower of Babel: "Go go let us go down and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech."With this we move in off of the ocean, and into a city-- it is New Year's Eve and the street is a sea of revelers. Here Pick and Mayer's camera lingers for a couple of minutes before picking up the thread that constitutes the "story", to which the rest of the film is oblivious:A small family unit which runs a low-down bar on the main thoroughfare in town constitutes the central zone of the film. A husband and wife are keeping the food and drinks coming to the drunken, lower-working class revelers tossing confetti and streamers for the holiday. A baby sleeps in a carriage. Suddenly an ominous dark silhouette appears on the frosty outer side of the rear kitchen's window, and is sighted by the wife, who instantly deflates-- all her joy and enthusiasm for the coming countdown to midnight are instantly sapped.The intimate Kammerspiel which follows, triggered by the arrival of the wife's mother-in-law, is constantly orbited by the world outside. (As is typical for a Mayer film, the characters are nameless: The husband, The wife, His Mother) The camera continuously places the emotional strife of the trio of the man and his wife, and her terrible feuding with her schizoid mother-in-law, into context of the larger human universe. Intercut with their scenes of impending tragedy and near operatic gloom are shots of the oblivious streets: grand hotels with elegant appointments and well-heeled revelers in tux flowing out of limousines (welcoed through a revolving door operated by Emil Janning's spiritual predecessor), organ grinders and panhandlers with beaten faces crushedby prison time, bawdy bourgoise, flappers, rowdy laborers, streamers and confetti everywhere. Whereas most films place their characters in the center of the human universe, absorbing all the significance and spiritual gravity made available via the story, Sylvester, despite the pathos of the impending tragedy in the tiny family unit's unfolding drama, de-emphasizes the importance of the family... the narrative strains at times to disassociate itself with them, lingering for solid stretches of minutes, tracking up and down the streets, picking out stranger after stranger, settling on no one and everyone.It's via this dis/association that the power of the film multiplies, gathering the force and impact of the cruel reality of existence: a world paying lip service to the rest of itself, even in it's most awful of crises. The world spins; life goes on. I mentioned in my previous essay (linked above) for Sylvester:I still believe that to be true. What Mayer was attempting to do here is very difficult to articulate in words... thus the opening statement from Babel. This is a film beyond language, beyond a general statement. That barrier that confounds its explanation is the same existential barrier that exists between the family unit and the world outside, which is the barrier that exists between every human heart’s lived life, and the rest of the surrounding world. To paraphrase Tom Regan in Miller’s Crossing: “Nobody really knows anybody—not that well.”

同类型

  • HD
  • 全65集
  • HD
  • 黑龙江卫视全32集
  • 全34集
  • 全38集
  • 全6集
  • 全12集

同主演

  • HD
  • HD

Sylvester评论

  • 评论加载中...

Sylvester常见问题

    1、《Sylvester》讲述的是什么故事?

    秋霞电影网网友:Sylvester讲述了该剧讲述了Sylvester, by the hugely underrated Lupu Pick is one of the least known films of the silent era, and unjustly so. Pick, the director of the slightly less obscure Scherben (Shattered), is almost as forgotten as this, his masterpiece... a film that without doubt, in it's time, was one of the most important of the German silent era.This great Kammerspiel is the middle entry in a trilogy written by the master screenwriter Carl Mayer (see here for a web resource for Mayer, as well as a writeup on Sylvester), all three of which were intended to fall under the directorial auspices of Pick: the first was Scherben (Shattered), the second was Sylvester (New Years Eve), and the last was Der Letzte Mann (The Last Laugh), which, as the film went into production, shifted directorial hands-- and was ultimately helmed by another of Mayer's ongoing collaborators, the great F. W. Murnau.Much has been made about the supposed innovations of Der Letzte Mann/Last Laugh: that it was the first film to be produced without intertitles, and that it was the film to "unchain the camera" via the integration of subjective camera movements. Some attribute these innovations to Murnau completely, others give credit to Karl Freund for innovating the moving camera. Others suggest that it was within the script for Letzte Mann that instructions for the moving camera can be located, and that this innovation, in this film, rests wth Mayer.As for the intertitle issue, the myth is easy to debunk: in Germany at least, one can, through exploration of chronologically preceding titles written by Mayer, see that this screenwriter had been seeking out this kind narrative-pictorial purity for years already by the time Letzte went into production. Hintertreppe (Backstairs, 1921, directed by Leopold Jessner, assisted by Paul Leni), Scherben (Shattered, 1921), Die Strasse (The Street, 1923, directed by Karl Grune), Sylvester (New Years Eve, 1924, Pick) all ran, in initial, domestic German release, with one-to-no intertitles. That makes Der Letzte Mann the fifth film that Mayer scripted for execution without intertitles.Putting aside the issue of the preceding use of moving camera by Yevgeni Bauer, Raul Walsh, Giovanni Pastrone, D.W. Griffith, etc-- the issue of who in Germany who first conceived and extensively utilized the subjective moving camera is put to rest with a simple viewing of Sylvester.Like all Carl Mayer tales-- and like Scherben before it-- Sylvester is an exceedingly simple story... it is New Years Eve, and all levels of the social strata are celebrating. Like a restless deity exploring the substance of his human creations, in all the colliding facets of their existence, the camera comes in out of the rolling waves of the void of nighttime... announcing with a single opening intertitle the inscription from the Tower of Babel: "Go go let us go down and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech."With this we move in off of the ocean, and into a city-- it is New Year's Eve and the street is a sea of revelers. Here Pick and Mayer's camera lingers for a couple of minutes before picking up the thread that constitutes the "story", to which the rest of the film is oblivious:A small family unit which runs a low-down bar on the main thoroughfare in town constitutes the central zone of the film. A husband and wife are keeping the food and drinks coming to the drunken, lower-working class revelers tossing confetti and streamers for the holiday. A baby sleeps in a carriage. Suddenly an ominous dark silhouette appears on the frosty outer side of the rear kitchen's window, and is sighted by the wife, who instantly deflates-- all her joy and enthusiasm for the coming countdown to midnight are instantly sapped.The intimate Kammerspiel which follows, triggered by the arrival of the wife's mother-in-law, is constantly orbited by the world outside. (As is typical for a Mayer film, the characters are nameless: The husband, The wife, His Mother) The camera continuously places the emotional strife of the trio of the man and his wife, and her terrible feuding with her schizoid mother-in-law, into context of the larger human universe. Intercut with their scenes of impending tragedy and near operatic gloom are shots of the oblivious streets: grand hotels with elegant appointments and well-heeled revelers in tux flowing out of limousines (welcoed through a revolving door operated by Emil Janning's spiritual predecessor), organ grinders and panhandlers with beaten faces crushedby prison time, bawdy bourgoise, flappers, rowdy laborers, streamers and confetti everywhere. Whereas most films place their characters in the center of the human universe, absorbing all the significance and spiritual gravity made available via the story, Sylvester, despite the pathos of the impending tragedy in the tiny family unit's unfolding drama, de-emphasizes the importance of the family... the narrative strains at times to disassociate itself with them, lingering for solid stretches of minutes, tracking up and down the streets, picking out stranger after stranger, settling on no one and everyone.It's via this dis/association that the power of the film multiplies, gathering the force and impact of the cruel reality of existence: a world paying lip service to the rest of itself, even in it's most awful of crises. The world spins; life goes on. I mentioned in my previous essay (linked above) for Sylvester:I still believe that to be true. What Mayer was attempting to do here is very difficult to articulate in words... thus the opening statement from Babel. This is a film beyond language, beyond a general statement. That barrier that confounds its explanation is the same existential barrier that exists between the family unit and the world outside, which is the barrier that exists between every human heart’s lived life, and the rest of the surrounding world. To paraphrase Tom Regan in Miller’s Crossing: “Nobody really knows anybody—not that well.”

    2、《Sylvester》分集剧情介绍?

    飘花电影网友:《Sylvester》上映了,通过yccctv电影网就能看到Sylvester分集剧情介绍,

    3、《Sylvester》有多少集?

    被窝电影网友:现在更新每集 45分钟。具体总集数可以去百度问答看看

    4、《Sylvester》2002 年几月几日播出

    青苹果影院网友:截止到2023-01-13 14:44:48 ,《Sylvester》已经更新到更新至集。

    5、哪个网站可以免费看正版《Sylvester》

    艾玛影院网友:除了优酷视频视频软件之外你还可以去爱奇艺芒果tvyccctv电影网百度视频等平台去看正版视频。

    6、在《Sylvester》这部剧中,你觉得Eugen,Klöpfer,Edith,Posca,弗里达·李察,Karl,Harbacher,EugenKlöpfer,EdithPosca,KarlHarbacher,尤利乌斯·E·赫尔曼,RudolfBlümner的演技怎么样?

    影视大全网友:最近有Eugen,Klöpfer,Edith,Posca,弗里达·李察,Karl,Harbacher,EugenKlöpfer,EdithPosca,KarlHarbacher,尤利乌斯·E·赫尔曼,RudolfBlümner等演员主演的剧情 ——Sylvester一经播出就受到了很多观众的欢迎和认可,这部电视剧里面,演员的演技都是非常值得肯定的,我觉得鲁普·皮克 , 在里面的演技非常的好,他能够去把握这个角色所要表达的情感,向观众展现出更好的作品。

    7、《Sylvester》电视剧演员有哪些

    人人影视网友:有以下演员主演:Eugen Klöpfer Edith Posca 弗里达·李察 Karl Harbacher EugenKlöpfer EdithPosca KarlHarbacher 尤利乌斯·E·赫尔曼 RudolfBlümner

    8、手机端软件app怎么免费看《Sylvester》电视剧

    星辰影院网友:您可以用手机打开百度APP在搜索框里输入:Sylvester手机在线观看免费,就可以找到免费正版播放资源了。手机免费看Sylvester网址:/tvcontent/63022.html,这个网站免费无广告。

    9、哪个软件可以看Sylvester

    小草影视网友:很多地方都可以看呀,我是在百度上搜索Sylvester免费在线观看找到的,打开百度APP后直接搜索“Sylvester免费在线观看”就能看了。

    10、《Sylvester》评价怎么样?

    豆瓣电影影评:我其实是想给Sylvester4颗星的,但是稍微回味了一会儿,觉得它不值,还是三星半吧。其实,我一向对国产剧非常宽容,甚至可以大言不惭的说,在国内和国际制作水平差距极大的情况下,我就是“双标”——都不在一个起跑线上,根本没法比呀。所以经常出现国外影片堪堪尚可,我却只给三星及格,国产剧只是稍微拍出了一点点好看,我就会给三星及以上,如果演员演技爆炸或者剧本极佳,我也不会吝啬我的5星,但是如果按照给国外影片打分的标准,这些国产剧可能通通都只能有三四颗星以下。

    丢豆网影评:剧情很流畅,人物也很丰满,节奏把握的很好,很有年代感。没有过多煽情,每个人物都发挥了作用,细节也很到位。整个影片三观也很正,主演员们感情真挚,总体来说,可以和朋友一起看,推荐!!!

    mtime时光网影评:第一次这么喜欢一部剧的女主角这个角色 聪明 独立 淡然 很有自己的主见 特别是略微带有的那一点狡黠 真是可爱极了!

    烂番茄影评:男女主角真是清新可爱,看了之后,让我蠢蠢欲动,非常想早恋,可惜已过了早恋的年龄,o(╯□╰)o